Journal of Creation archive > Volume 26 Issue 2
Journal of Creation
Volume 26, Issue 2
Published August 2012
127 pages
Click here to subscribe to the Journal of Creation
Contents:
Page |
Title |
3 |
Kelp could have produced abundant dropstones during the Flood
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
4–6 |
Mercury’s magnetic field is fading fast—latest spacecraft data confirm evidence for a young solar system
Perspective by D. Russell Humphreys |
6–7 |
Is Archaeopteryx a feathered dinosaur?
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
8–10 |
Finch beaks point to a Creator who provides
Perspective by Jean K. Lightner |
10 |
Problems with the evolutionary interpretation of limb design
Perspective by Dominic Statham |
11–12 |
Elasmosaurus? No, you goose …
Perspective by Carl Wieland |
12–13 |
Woolly and Columbian mammoths likely the same species
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
14–16 |
Just-so evolution story A review of Anarchy Evolution: Faith, Science, and Bad Religion in a World Without God by Greg Graffin and Steve Olson Book Review by Jerry Bergman |
17–20 |
Biology well described, but evolution hardly a fact A review of The Fact of Evolution by Cameron M. Smith Book Review by John Woodmorappe |
20–24 |
Scientific orthodoxy, theological innovation A review of The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion by Peter Harrison (Ed.) Book Review by Daniel Davidson |
25–29 |
Soft secularism is no solution A review of Worlds Before Adam: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Reform by Martin J.S. Rudwick Book Review by John K. Reed |
30–35 |
Did God really communicate to man through the Bible? A review of Did Adam and Eve Really Exist? Who They Were and Why You Should Care by C. John Collins Book Review by Greg Demme |
36–38 |
A theological challenge to biblical creation A review of Darwin, Creation and the Fall: Theological Challenges by R.J. Berry and T.A. Noble (Eds.) Book Review by Lita Sanders |
38–41 |
Intelligent Design in review A review of Intelligent Design 101 by H. Wayne House (Ed.) Book Review by Daniel Davidson |
42–43 |
Where is Noah’s Ark?—a closer look at the biblical clues
Letter to the Editor from Anne Habermehl. Reply: D. Russell Humphreys |
43–45 |
Is Darius, the king of Ezra 6:14–15, the same king as the Artaxerxes of Ezra 7:1?
Letter to the Editor from Brian Schuh. Reply: David Austin |
45–49 |
Argon diffusion data support RATE’s 6,000-year helium age of the earth
Letter to the Editor from Gary H. Loechelt. Reply: D. Russell Humphreys |
50–56 |
Wisdom literature and the question of priority—Solomon’s Proverbs or Amenemope’s Instruction
Viewpoint by Patrick Clarke |
57–62 |
A new magnetic field theory and Flood model—part 1
Viewpoint by Don Stenberg |
63–69 |
A new magnetic field theory and Flood model—part 2
Viewpoint by Don Stenberg |
70–72 |
James Tour—leading scientist and Darwin skeptic
Paper by Jerry Bergman |
73–81 |
An impact Flood submodel—dealing with issues
Paper by Michael J. Oard |
82–87 |
Evaluating potential post-Flood boundaries with biostratigraphy—the Pliocene/Pleistocene boundary
Paper by Marcus R. Ross |
88–99 |
An evaluation of codes more compact than the natural genetic code
Paper by Royal Truman |
100–109 |
Three early arguments for deep time—part 3: the ‘geognostic pile’
Paper by John K. Reed and Michael J. Oard |
110–115 |
Did the Nazis rewrite the Bible?
Paper by Russell Grigg |
116–119 |
Terry Hamblin—creationist and pathbreaking scientist Paper by Jerry Bergman |
119 | Errata |
120–127 |
Defining arguments away—the distorted language of secularism
Essay by Shaun Doyle |
Readers’ comments
Comments are automatically closed 14 days after publication.